Skip to content

Governor

Statewide

Gina Hinojosa (D) won the Texas governor race with 52.8% of the vote to Greg Abbott's (R) 45.7%, as called by the Associated Press.

Results

Gina Hinojosa vs. Greg AbbottNovember 3 results

Pre-electionLean R
Democrat: Gina HinojosaWinner
52.8 percent of the vote5,230,789 votes
Republican: Greg Abbott (incumbent)
45.7 percent of the vote4,524,527 votes

Pat Dixon (Libertarian) 1.5%

Called by AP9,907,381 votes counted
Texas Secretary of State (opens in new tab)

State count last updated Nov. 4, 4:18 p.m. CT. Unofficial until the Legislature canvasses the race after it convenes Jan. 12, 2027.

Counties must finish their canvass by Nov. 17, and totals can change until then.

County Results

Hinojosa won 52.8% of the vote and led in 37 of 254 counties, which cast 68.8% of the votes counted.

Votes counted in all 254 counties.

Loading map...

Source: Texas Secretary of State returns (opens in new tab). State count last updated Nov. 4, 4:18 p.m. CT.

Texas' chief executive. The governor signs or vetoes legislation, appoints agency heads, and commands the National Guard.

Before Election Day: Ratings and Analysis

Written before Election Day and not updated with returns. Ratings and polls describe the race before any returns were reported.

Greg Abbott faces Democrat Gina Hinojosa on Nov. 3. Cook Political Report and Sabato's Crystal Ball rate the race Lean Republican. Cook moved it from Likely Republican to Lean Republican on Oct. 1, 2026. Inside Elections moved it from Lean Republican to Tilt Republican on Oct. 29. Abbott won the March primary with 81.8%. Hinojosa won the Democratic nomination with 58.5%.

Cook Political Report moved the race from Likely Republican to Lean Republican on Oct. 1, 2026. Sabato's Crystal Ball moved it to Lean Republican on Sept. 22. Inside Elections rates it Tilt Republican, a move from Lean Republican on Oct. 29.

Abbott, governor since 2015, seeks a fourth term against Democratic state representative Gina Hinojosa of Austin.

Abbott won reelection in 2022 by about 11 points. No Democrat has won the governorship since Ann Richards in 1990. Ratings are forecasters' assessments, not TexPolls forecasts.

November Polling Before Election Day

Every poll here was conducted before Election Day. They stay here for comparison with the returns.

53 polls since the May 26 runoffs; 26 count toward our average.

Each dot is a poll, placed by its margin and colored by who led. Filled dots are in our average.
D+5EvenR+5Abbott AheadHinojosa AheadJunJulAugSepOctNov. 3Early voting began Oct. 19
General-election polls since the May 26 runoffs
Field EndedPollsterHinojosa (D)Abbott (R)MarginIn Our Average
June 22UT Texas Politics Project40%47%Abbott +7No · Registered voters
June 27New York Times / Siena College44%51%Abbott +7Yes
July 17Texas Public Opinion Research42%45%Abbott +3No · Political sponsor
July 27Fox News49%50%Abbott +1No · Registered voters
July 30Texas Pulse / ReconMR45%46%Abbott +1Yes
July 30Texas Southern University43%49%Abbott +6Yes
Aug. 10Emerson College45%49%Abbott +4Yes
Aug. 13UT Texas Politics Project40%45%Abbott +5No · Registered voters
Aug. 24Texas Public Opinion Research42%49%Abbott +7No · Political sponsor
Aug. 26Overton Insights / Texas Public Policy Foundation48.8%51.2%Abbott +2.4Yes
Sept. 1AARP / Fabrizio Ward + Impact Research46%49%Abbott +3Yes
Sept. 4N+ Univision / YouGov47%47%TiedNo · Registered voters
Sept. 10NBC 5 Dallas / Telemundo Texas / Mason-Dixon41%48%Abbott +7Yes
Sept. 11ReconMR / Siena Research Institute49%45%Hinojosa +4Yes
Sept. 14Emerson College46%49%Abbott +3Yes
Sept. 19Texas Southern University45%49%Abbott +4Yes
Sept. 20Marist Poll49%46%Hinojosa +3No · Registered voters
Sept. 22Texas Public Opinion Research46%50%Abbott +4No · Political sponsor
Sept. 24Stratus Intelligence45%50%Abbott +5No · Political sponsor
Sept. 26Big Data Poll44.4%48.9%Abbott +4.5Yes
Sept. 28Fox News47%52%Abbott +5Yes
Sept. 28Guidant Polling & Strategy / Public First Action44%46%Abbott +2No · Political sponsor
Sept. 28UMass Lowell / YouGov44%48%Abbott +4Yes
Sept. 30New York Times / Siena College49%46%Hinojosa +3Yes
Oct. 5UT Texas Politics Project49%48%Hinojosa +1Yes
Oct. 5YouGov48%47%Hinojosa +1No · Methods not fully disclosed
Oct. 8GBAO47%45%Hinojosa +2No · Political sponsor
Oct. 8ReconMR / Siena Research Institute47%48%Abbott +1Yes
Oct. 11Marist Poll45%49%Abbott +4Yes
Oct. 13GS Strategy Group / New River Strategies (Cook Political Report)46%48%Abbott +2No · Methods not fully disclosed
Oct. 14ActiVote49.1%50.9%Abbott +1.8No · Below the 500-respondent minimum
Oct. 14University of Houston Hobby School of Public Affairs46%49%Abbott +3Yes
Oct. 16CBS News / YouGov48%52%Abbott +4Yes
Oct. 18Pollfinity Research46%45%Hinojosa +1No · Political sponsor
Oct. 18Texas Public Opinion Research47%51%Abbott +4No · Political sponsor
Oct. 19Emerson College47%51%Abbott +4Yes
Oct. 19Fox News47%52%Abbott +5Yes
Oct. 20VoteHub / Verasight46.4%47.7%Abbott +1.3Yes
Oct. 21ActiVote47.5%52.5%Abbott +5No · Below the 500-respondent minimum
Oct. 21N+ Univision / YouGov46%48%Abbott +2No · Registered voters
Oct. 25Texas Southern University47%50%Abbott +3Yes
Oct. 26254 Labs / YouGov Blue49%46%Hinojosa +3No · Political sponsor
Oct. 26Data for Progress47%48%Abbott +1No · Political sponsor
Oct. 27CNN / SSRS46%48%Abbott +2Yes
Oct. 27On Point Polling47.2%49.3%Abbott +2.1No · Methods not fully disclosed
Oct. 28Quantus Insights46.3%51.6%Abbott +5.3No · Political sponsor
Oct. 29ActiVote47.9%52.1%Abbott +4.2No · Below the 500-respondent minimum
Oct. 29YouGov49%50%Abbott +1Yes
Oct. 30KStrat47%49%Abbott +2No · Methods not fully disclosed
Nov. 1AtlasIntel49.2%47.6%Hinojosa +1.6No · Not a likely-voter sample
Nov. 1Emerson College48.9%49.7%Abbott +0.8No · No public release
Nov. 1New York Times / Siena College48%47%Hinojosa +1Yes
Nov. 2Research Co.44%46%Abbott +2No · Below the 500-respondent minimum
Source:How we select polls (opens in new tab)·Pollster releases, linked in the table below·As of Nov. 3, 2026
  • Research Co. · Nov. 2, 2026 · 450 LV · ±4.6 MOE

    Hinojosa 44% · Abbott 46%Abbott +2Undec. 8%

    Below the 500-respondent minimum · excluded from average

  • Emerson College · Nov. 1, 2026 · 500 LV

    Hinojosa 48.9% · Abbott 49.7%Abbott +0.8

    No public release · excluded from average

  • New York Times / Siena College · Nov. 1, 2026 · 1,215 LV · ±3.3 MOE

    Hinojosa 48% · Abbott 47%Hinojosa +1Undec. 5%

  • AtlasIntel · Nov. 1, 2026 · 1,678 adults · ±2 MOE

    Hinojosa 49.2% · Abbott 47.6%Hinojosa +1.6Undec. 1.2%

    Not a likely-voter sample · excluded from average

  • KStrat · Oct. 30, 2026 · 900 LV · ±3.3 MOE

    Hinojosa 47% · Abbott 49%Abbott +2Undec. 3%

    Methods not fully disclosed · excluded from average

  • YouGov · Oct. 29, 2026 · 2,141 LV · ±2.9 MOE

    Hinojosa 49% · Abbott 50%Abbott +1Undec. 0%

    Includes leaners

  • ActiVote · Oct. 29, 2026 · 400 LV

    Hinojosa 47.9% · Abbott 52.1%Abbott +4.2

    Below the 500-respondent minimum · excluded from average

  • Quantus Insights · Oct. 28, 2026 · 1,214 LV · ±3.2 MOE

    Hinojosa 46.3% · Abbott 51.6%Abbott +5.3Undec. 1%

    Political sponsor · excluded from average · includes leaners

  • CNN / SSRS · Oct. 27, 2026 · 923 registered voters, weighted by predicted probability of voting · ±4.2 MOE

    Hinojosa 46% · Abbott 48%Abbott +2

    Includes leaners

  • On Point Polling · Oct. 27, 2026 · 1,184 registered voters, reweighted to likely voters · ±2.9 MOE

    Hinojosa 47.2% · Abbott 49.3%Abbott +2.1Undec. 2.1%

    Methods not fully disclosed · excluded from average

  • 254 Labs / YouGov Blue · Oct. 26, 2026 · 1,000 registered voters, weighted to likely-voter targets · ±4.6 MOE

    Hinojosa 49% · Abbott 46%Hinojosa +3

    Political sponsor · excluded from average · includes leaners

  • Data for Progress · Oct. 26, 2026 · 712 LV · ±4 MOE

    Hinojosa 47% · Abbott 48%Abbott +1Undec. 4%

    Political sponsor · excluded from average

  • Texas Southern University · Oct. 25, 2026 · 2,000 LV · ±2.19 MOE

    Hinojosa 47% · Abbott 50%Abbott +3Undec. 1%

  • N+ Univision / YouGov · Oct. 21, 2026 · 1,000 RV · ±3.8 MOE

    Hinojosa 46% · Abbott 48%Abbott +2Undec. 5%

    Registered voters · excluded from average

  • ActiVote · Oct. 21, 2026 · 400 LV

    Hinojosa 47.5% · Abbott 52.5%Abbott +5

    Below the 500-respondent minimum · excluded from average

  • VoteHub / Verasight · Oct. 20, 2026 · 601 RV · LV model · ±4.3 MOE

    Hinojosa 46.4% · Abbott 47.7%Abbott +1.3Undec. 5.1%

    Includes leaners

  • Emerson College · Oct. 19, 2026 · 1,000 LV · ±3.1 credibility interval

    Hinojosa 47% · Abbott 51%Abbott +4Undec. 0%

    Includes leaners

  • Fox News · Oct. 19, 2026 · 1,398 LV · ±2.5 MOE

    Hinojosa 47% · Abbott 52%Abbott +5Undec. 1%

    Includes leaners

  • Texas Public Opinion Research · Oct. 18, 2026 · 969 LV · ±3.9 MOE

    Hinojosa 47% · Abbott 51%Abbott +4Undec. 1%

    Political sponsor · excluded from average · includes leaners

  • Pollfinity Research · Oct. 18, 2026 · 278 RV · ±6.5 MOE

    Hinojosa 46% · Abbott 45%Hinojosa +1Undec. 5%

    Political sponsor · excluded from average

  • CBS News / YouGov · Oct. 16, 2026 · 1,492 LV · ±3.5 MOE

    Hinojosa 48% · Abbott 52%Abbott +4Undec. 0%

    Includes leaners

  • University of Houston Hobby School of Public Affairs · Oct. 14, 2026 · 2,000 LV · ±2.19 MOE

    Hinojosa 46% · Abbott 49%Abbott +3Undec. 3%

  • ActiVote · Oct. 14, 2026 · 400 LV

    Hinojosa 49.1% · Abbott 50.9%Abbott +1.8

    Below the 500-respondent minimum · excluded from average

  • GS Strategy Group / New River Strategies (Cook Political Report) · Oct. 13, 2026 · 934 LV

    Hinojosa 46% · Abbott 48%Abbott +2Undec. 3%

    Methods not fully disclosed · excluded from average · includes leaners

  • Marist Poll · Oct. 11, 2026 · 1,196 LV · ±4.9 MOE

    Hinojosa 45% · Abbott 49%Abbott +4Undec. 3%

  • ReconMR / Siena Research Institute · Oct. 8, 2026 · 617 LV · ±4.4 MOE

    Hinojosa 47% · Abbott 48%Abbott +1Undec. 3%

  • GBAO · Oct. 8, 2026 · 800 LV · ±3.5 MOE

    Hinojosa 47% · Abbott 45%Hinojosa +2

    Political sponsor · excluded from average

  • YouGov · Oct. 5, 2026 · 3,625 LV · ±3 MOE

    Hinojosa 48% · Abbott 47%Hinojosa +1Undec. 5%

    Methods not fully disclosed · excluded from average

  • UT Texas Politics Project · Oct. 5, 2026 · 861 LV · ±3.34 MOE

    Hinojosa 49% · Abbott 48%Hinojosa +1Undec. 0%

    Includes leaners

  • New York Times / Siena College · Sept. 30, 2026 · 615 LV · ±4.5 MOE

    Hinojosa 49% · Abbott 46%Hinojosa +3Undec. 5%

  • Fox News · Sept. 28, 2026 · 881 LV · ±3 MOE

    Hinojosa 47% · Abbott 52%Abbott +5Undec. 1%

    Includes leaners

  • UMass Lowell / YouGov · Sept. 28, 2026 · 850 LV · ±4.5 MOE

    Hinojosa 44% · Abbott 48%Abbott +4Undec. 6%

  • Guidant Polling & Strategy / Public First Action · Sept. 28, 2026 · 800 LV · ±3.46 MOE

    Hinojosa 44% · Abbott 46%Abbott +2Undec. 5%

    Political sponsor · excluded from average

  • Big Data Poll · Sept. 26, 2026 · 698 LV · ±4 MOE

    Hinojosa 44.4% · Abbott 48.9%Abbott +4.5

    Includes leaners

  • Stratus Intelligence · Sept. 24, 2026 · 865 LV · ±3.5 MOE

    Hinojosa 45% · Abbott 50%Abbott +5

    Political sponsor · excluded from average

  • Texas Public Opinion Research · Sept. 22, 2026 · 1,007 LV · ±3.6 MOE

    Hinojosa 46% · Abbott 50%Abbott +4

    Political sponsor · excluded from average · includes leaners

  • Marist Poll · Sept. 20, 2026 · 1,139 RV · ±4.4 MOE

    Hinojosa 49% · Abbott 46%Hinojosa +3Undec. 3%

    Registered voters · excluded from average

  • Texas Southern University · Sept. 19, 2026 · 1,800 LV · ±2.31 MOE

    Hinojosa 45% · Abbott 49%Abbott +4Undec. 4%

  • Emerson College · Sept. 14, 2026 · 1,000 LV · ±3 credibility interval

    Hinojosa 46% · Abbott 49%Abbott +3Undec. 4%

  • ReconMR / Siena Research Institute · Sept. 11, 2026 · 614 LV · ±4.3 MOE

    Hinojosa 49% · Abbott 45%Hinojosa +4Undec. 4%

  • NBC 5 Dallas / Telemundo Texas / Mason-Dixon · Sept. 10, 2026 · 625 LV · ±4 MOE

    Hinojosa 41% · Abbott 48%Abbott +7Undec. 8%

  • N+ Univision / YouGov · Sept. 4, 2026 · 1,000 RV · ±3.6 equivalent MOE

    Hinojosa 47% · Abbott 47%TiedUndec. 5%

    Registered voters · excluded from average

  • AARP / Fabrizio Ward + Impact Research · Sept. 1, 2026 · 895 LV · ±3.3 MOE

    Hinojosa 46% · Abbott 49%Abbott +3Undec. 5%

    Includes leaners

  • Overton Insights / Texas Public Policy Foundation · Aug. 26, 2026 · 1,167 LV · ±2.9 MOE

    Hinojosa 48.8% · Abbott 51.2%Abbott +2.4Undec. 0%

    Includes leaners

  • Texas Public Opinion Research · Aug. 24, 2026 · 1,000 LV · ±3.3 MOE

    Hinojosa 42% · Abbott 49%Abbott +7

    Political sponsor · excluded from average

  • UT Texas Politics Project · Aug. 13, 2026 · 1,200 RV · ±2.83 MOE

    Hinojosa 40% · Abbott 45%Abbott +5

    Registered voters · excluded from average

  • Emerson College · Aug. 10, 2026 · 1,000 LV · ±3 MOE

    Hinojosa 45% · Abbott 49%Abbott +4

  • Texas Southern University · July 30, 2026 · 1,200 LV · ±2.83 MOE

    Hinojosa 43% · Abbott 49%Abbott +6

  • Texas Pulse / ReconMR · July 30, 2026 · 619 LV · ±4.7 MOE

    Hinojosa 45% · Abbott 46%Abbott +1

  • Fox News · July 27, 2026 · 1,006 RV · ±3 MOE

    Hinojosa 49% · Abbott 50%Abbott +1

    Registered voters · excluded from average

  • Texas Public Opinion Research · July 17, 2026 · 1,048 LV · ±3.4 MOE

    Hinojosa 42% · Abbott 45%Abbott +3

    Political sponsor · excluded from average

  • New York Times / Siena College · June 27, 2026 · 656 LV · ±4.5 MOE

    Hinojosa 44% · Abbott 51%Abbott +7Undec. 5%

  • UT Texas Politics Project · June 22, 2026 · 1,200 RV · ±3.47 MOE

    Hinojosa 40% · Abbott 47%Abbott +7

    Registered voters · excluded from average

  • Texas Public Opinion Research · April 20, 2026 · 1,865 LV · ±2.5 MOE

    Hinojosa 43% · Abbott 48%Abbott +5

    Political sponsor · excluded from average

  • UT Tyler · Feb. 22, 2026 · 1,117 · ±3.4 MOE

    Hinojosa 41% · Abbott 49%Abbott +8

    Not a likely-voter sample · excluded from average

  • Emerson College · Jan 2026 · 1,165 RV · ±2.8 MOE

    Hinojosa 42% · Abbott 50%Abbott +8

    Registered voters · excluded from average

Methodology and source notes for 56 polls
  • Research Co., Nov. 2, 2026

    Fielded October 31 to November 2, 2026 among 450 likely voters in Texas; online survey weighted to U.S. census figures for age and gender; margin of error ±4.6 points. First-choice result among all 450 respondents; the release's headline 50% to 48% figure counts decided voters only (414 decided). No sponsor is named in the release, which says only that the poll was conducted by Research Co. Display only: below the 500-respondent statewide minimum.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • Emerson College, Nov. 1, 2026

    Emerson College Polling for Poll Vault, the RealClearPolitics newsletter by Sean Trende (a media sponsor). Fielded October 31 to November 1, 2026; 500 likely voters. Abbott 49.7%, Hinojosa 48.9% as shown on the 99 Chambers pollster listing, which links the Poll Vault post (https://pollvault.substack.com/p/new-poll-vault-emerson-senate-and). The full release is for paid subscribers only, and it was not found in the public sources checked on November 3 (Emerson's site and Poll Vault's free page), so the margin of error, mode, question wording, ballot type, and undecided share are not available here. Display only: TexPolls averages require a public source and disclosed methodology.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • New York Times / Siena College, Nov. 1, 2026

    Fielded Oct. 27 to Nov. 1, 2026 among 1,215 likely voters. Live cellular and landline interviews in English and Spanish; 14% of interviews among self-reported Hispanics were in Spanish. Stratified sample of registered voters from the L2 voter file, supplemented with Marketing Systems Group matched cell numbers. NYT weighted with energy balancing to the likely electorate (party, race, age, gender, education, turnout history, region, 2024 vote) and adjusted for self-reported vote intention. Published full-sample margin of error ±3.3 points includes design effect 1.34; Siena's release gives ±3.4 (design effect 1.29) for the completed-interview sample, which applies to later questions, not these ballot results. Governor ballot as published; interviewers pressed undecided respondents once ("If you had to decide today") within the question, and no separate leaner follow-up is shown. Another candidate was reported as less than 0.5%, not an exact zero.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • AtlasIntel, Nov. 1, 2026

    Fielded October 28 to November 1, 2026 among 1,678 Texas adults (not likely voters); web-based Atlas Random Digital Recruitment; margin of error about 2 points at 95%. First-choice result; 0.7% said they would not vote. No sponsor is named in the release. Display only: adult sample.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • KStrat, Oct. 30, 2026

    KStrat (Kreate Strategies, Houston) statewide survey, conducted October 27 to 30, 2026, among 900 likely Texas voters "using an online panel methodology"; published margin of error ±3.3%. Released October 30, 2026. The release reports 3% undecided in the Governor's race and gives no figure for the Libertarian or any other candidate. It does not publish question wording, weighting, or the panel source; the full results and methodology are offered only after submitting a name and email on the release page, so they were not reviewed. Display only: held out of the average because the methodology is not publicly disclosed. The release names no sponsor or client.

    Sponsor review: Limited to the release

    Funding: Not disclosed in the reviewed materials.

    Pollster background: KStrat (Kreate Strategies) describes its work as surveys, influence mapping, and narrative analysis for corporate affairs, public affairs, and government affairs teams (kstrat.net). An FEC disbursement search for Kreate Strategies and KStrat (2023-26) returned no payments from candidates, parties, or PACs.

    No sponsor, client, or payer is named in the release. The full results sit behind a contact form and were not reviewed, so this review covers the public release only. Not classified as a political poll: the firm's own pages describe corporate and public affairs research, and no campaign or committee payments were found.

    Reviewed Oct. 31, 2026.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • YouGov, Oct. 29, 2026

    YouGov release on YouGov's document host, fielded October 26 to 29, 2026 among 2,141 Texas likely voters; published margin of error ±2.9 points. Posted November 1, 2026 (the file is dated that day on YouGov's document host); the document names no sponsor, and no release article was found. Sample: "Stratified random sample of voters selected from a list of Texas registered voters who were contacted via text message and interviewed on YouGov's web-based survey system." Weighted by raking to gender, age, race, in-state geography (using the current Texas voter list), and imputed education, party score, and 2024 presidential vote; likely voters are defined by a model using past vote, demographics, and self-reported likelihood to vote. Question: "Who did you vote for, or who will you vote for, in the election for Governor of Texas?" Respondents who had already voted were asked how they voted; undecided voters were asked which candidate they lean toward, and the published result includes leaners. No initial ballot is published. Other combines someone else 1% and I would not vote 1%; not sure 0%. Counted in the average: unlike the September 28 to October 5 wave, which is held out, this release discloses its sample frame, mode, and weighting.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • ActiVote, Oct. 29, 2026

    Field October 23 to 29 (median October 26); opt-in app panel; two-way share summing to 100. Display only: below the 500-respondent statewide minimum.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • Quantus Insights, Oct. 28, 2026

    Fielded October 26 to 28, 2026 by SMS invitation to mobile phones drawn by stratified random sampling from active registered Texas voter-file records; raked on sex, age, race and ethnicity, education, metro type, and congressional district. 1,221 likely voters completed; 7 who said they would not vote in this race were removed, leaving 1,214 for the ballot. Published ±3.2 points for the full sample at 95 percent, design effect 1.28. Question: "If the election for Governor of Texas were held today, for whom would you vote?" The 28 undecided were asked "Even if you are not sure, which candidate for Governor do you lean toward?" Initial ballot Abbott 50.7, Hinojosa 45.8, Pat Dixon (Libertarian) 1.2, undecided 2.3. With leaners Dixon 1.2, undecided 1.0. Political sponsor classification: Quantus Insights sells campaign consulting to candidates and committees (firm homepage, Team section), and FEC records show the NRSC paid Quantus Insights (Andover, MN) $15,000 for "POLITICAL STRATEGY CONSULTING" on March 23, 2026. The release names no sponsor for this survey.

    Sponsor review: Release and report checked

    Funding: Not disclosed in the reviewed materials.

    Pollster background: Quantus Insights offers campaign consulting to candidates, committees, and advocacy clients (quantusinsights.org). FEC Schedule B, 2025-26: NRSC $15,000 "POLITICAL STRATEGY CONSULTING" (2026-03-23); Iowans for Zach Nunn $4,700 "DIGITAL CONSULTING" (2026-05-29).

    No sponsor, client, or payer is named for this survey. The political classification rests on the firm's own campaign-consulting line and its 2026 FEC-reported payment from the NRSC, not on an identified client for this poll.

    Reviewed Oct. 30, 2026.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • CNN / SSRS, Oct. 27, 2026

    CNN poll conducted by SSRS, Oct. 20 to 27, 2026 (released Oct. 29), online and by telephone among 923 Texas registered voters (L2 registration-based sample n=423 plus SSRS Opinion Panel n=500), in English or Spanish. Likely-voter results weight all registered voters by modeled probability of voting. The margin of sampling error was +/-4.2 points including design effects. The published figure combines the initial question with a lean follow-up and, for those who already voted, how they voted. No initial-only ballot is published. Neither 4%, other 2%, no opinion under 0.5%. Governor wording: "If the election for governor in Texas were held today and the candidates were Gina Hinojosa, the Democrat, and Greg Abbott, the Republican, who would you be more likely to vote for?" followed by "...as of today, do you lean more toward:". Counted in the average under the leaner rule adopted Oct. 21, 2026.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • On Point Polling, Oct. 27, 2026

    Held out of the average: the weighting target ("the On Point composition") isn't published, undecided voters are assigned by model, and the firm, The Public Sentiment Institute (doing business as On Point Polling), was permanently banned by the aggregator FiftyPlusOne in August 2026 over an earlier Florida poll. Released October 29, 2026 on On Point's Substack. 1,184 Texas registered voters interviewed online through a Cint opt-in panel, with quotas on age, gender, and location. The release gives October 27 as the field date; the crosstab title says October 27 to 28. Likely voters are the same 1,184 respondents reweighted by a turnout model, with no separate likely-voter count. Published ±2.9 points for likely and registered voters. Ballot wording not published. This row stores the result as asked; On Point's "undecideds leaned" result allocates undecided voters "based on how decided voters with similar views and backgrounds plan to vote," not by a leaner question. Likely voters as asked: Hinojosa 47.2, Abbott 49.3, Pat Dixon (Libertarian) 1.5, undecided 2.1. Model-allocated: Abbott 50.1, Hinojosa 48.3, Dixon 1.5, undecided 0.1. Registered voters as asked: Abbott 42.6, Hinojosa 40.1, undecided 14.9. The methodology tab states: "Sponsor: On Point Polling. Not paid for by any candidate or committee."

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • 254 Labs / YouGov Blue, Oct. 26, 2026

    Fielded October 21-26, 2026 by YouGov Blue 'on behalf of 254 Labs'; released October 28. 1,000 Texas registered voters interviewed online and by text-to-web, quota-sampled, then weighted to likely-voter targets that 254 Labs supplied (including an early-vote turnout benchmark); the release headlines the results as likely voters, but no likely-voter count is published. Margin of error about 4.6 points. Respondents who had already voted were asked how they voted; undecided respondents were asked which way they lean and the lean answers are included in the totals. The release publishes no question wording, no first-choice result, and full crosstabs are subscriber-only. Who paid for the poll is not disclosed; listed as political because 254 Labs describes itself as a Texas political research and analytics organization that serves 'mission-aligned subscribers,' not because a payer was shown. Shown for reference and left out of the headline average.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • Data for Progress, Oct. 26, 2026

    Data for Progress crosstabs: "From October 23 to 26, 2026, Data for Progress conducted a survey of 712 likely voters in Texas using SMS and web panel respondents." Weighted to likely voters by age, gender, education, race, geography, and recalled presidential vote; English only; "The margin of error associated with the sample size is ±4 percentage points." The release (October 30, 2026) says DFP surveyed Maine, Michigan, and Texas "from October 23-27"; the Texas crosstabs give October 23 to 26, used here. Question: "If the November 2026 general election for Texas governor were held tomorrow, and these were the candidates, who would you vote for?" Choices: Abbott, Hinojosa, Libertarian Pat Dixon, not sure; no leaner follow-up published. Pat Dixon (Libertarian) 2, not sure 4. Political sponsor classification: Data for Progress describes itself as "a progressive research organization" and offers campaign clients "campaign strategy"; FEC records show 2025-26 polling payments from candidate committees (Sage for Senate $15,000, Yassamin Ansari for Congress $8,000, Nate Blouin for Utah $6,000) and PACs including Justice Democrats PAC and Working Families Party PAC. The release names no client for this survey.

    Sponsor review: Release and report checked

    Funding: Not disclosed in the reviewed materials.

    Pollster background: Data for Progress (Data for Progress, Inc., 501(c)(4), and Data for Progress Education Fund, 501(c)(3)); self-described progressive research organization offering polling and campaign strategy to progressive clients. FEC Schedule B, 2025-26: Sage for Senate $15,000 "POLLING" (2025-07-01); Yassamin Ansari for Congress $8,000 "POLLING" (2025-12-03); Nate Blouin for Utah $6,000 "RESEARCH" (2026-03-27); Justice Democrats PAC and Working Families Party PAC polling payments.

    No sponsor, client, or payer is named for this survey; the release and crosstabs show it as DFP's own. The political classification rests on the firm's campaign-polling and strategy work and its FEC-reported payments from Democratic candidate committees, the same test applied to Quantus Insights on 2026-10-30, not on an identified client for this poll.

    Reviewed Oct. 31, 2026.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • Texas Southern University, Oct. 25, 2026

    Fielded October 21-25, 2026; released October 29. The Barbara Jordan Public Policy Research and Survey Center at TSU reports a probability-based sample of 2,000 likely voters, +/-2.19-point margin of error, and a two-part likely-voter screen supplemented by past election participation. A random sample of registered voters was contacted by SMS and directed to an online survey in English or Spanish; weighted by multidimensional calibration on demographic, historical electoral, and geographic benchmarks. A little more than one-third of respondents had already voted, and the report calls the result vote intention. The report names no outside sponsor, publishes no question wording, and describes no leaned follow-up. Libertarian Pat Dixon 2%, unsure 1%.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • N+ Univision / YouGov, Oct. 21, 2026

    Fielded October 13-21, 2026; released October 27. N+ Univision media survey, overseen by Dr. Sergio Garcia-Rios (N+ Univision Director of Polling and Data) with BluePoint Analytix assisting on questionnaire review and analysis; fieldwork by YouGov. Online interviews of 1,000 registered Texas voters, weighted to registration lists, Census data, 2022 turnout, and 2020 and approximate 2024 presidential vote. Registered voters, so excluded from the likely-voter headline. The crosstabs report a 95% margin of error of 3.8 points computed with a design-effect adjustment for the weights, and note it does not reflect non-sampling error such as panel selection bias. Crosstabs label this measure 'Full Recoded' and publish neither ballot wording nor a separate leaner follow-up; one result only, treated as first choice. 1% chose another candidate and 5% were undecided.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • ActiVote, Oct. 21, 2026

    Field October 17 to 21 (median October 19); opt-in app panel; two-way share summing to 100. Display only: below the 500-respondent statewide minimum.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • VoteHub / Verasight, Oct. 20, 2026

    Sample: 601 actual registered-voter responses (600 complete and one partial), modeled to a likely-voter electorate; effective LV n=508.5 (rounded 509), not 509 actual LV interviews. Fielded October 1 to 20, 2026; released October 23. Verasight collected the email-invited online survey; VoteHub weighted and analyzed it. The Verasight Community mixes address/text probability recruitment and targeted online recruitment; this is not a simple random probability sample. Reported margin of error ±4.3 points at 95% confidence; design effect 1.18. Exact ballot/leaner wording, who received the follow-up, detailed weighting targets/trimming, and the likely-voter model formula are not disclosed in the reviewed materials. VoteHub is the identified media partner and publisher; no political commissioner is named. Exact payer and funding amount are not disclosed. We list it as a nonpartisan poll based on who published it; we have not reviewed its funding. Published LV leaned result: Abbott 47.7%, Hinojosa 46.4%, Pat Dixon 0.7%, unsure 5.1%, missing 0.0%; published categories sum to 99.9% because of rounding. Our table has no column for missing responses, and we don't assign the leftover rounding to any candidate. Initial support: Abbott 46.5%, Hinojosa 43.9%, Dixon 2.1%; the report doesn't say what the other 7.5% of first-choice answers were, so we don't count them as undecided. The first-choice and registered-voter results come from the same survey and are not counted as separate polls. This is the Governor question from the same survey as the Senate observation, not a second independent statewide sample.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • Emerson College, Oct. 19, 2026

    Fielded Oct. 17 to 19, 2026. Sponsored by Nexstar Media. Initial ballot Abbott 49, Hinojosa 45, Dixon 1, undecided 4. Undecided respondents were asked which candidate they lean toward. MMS text-to-web, IVR landline, and PureSpectrum panel. The poll was in English and Spanish. Counted under the leaner rule adopted Oct. 21, 2026.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • Fox News, Oct. 19, 2026

    Fielded Oct. 15 to 19, 2026. The Fox News Poll was jointly directed by Beacon Research (D) and Shaw & Company Research (R). The 2,011 registered-voter sample was drawn from the statewide voter file. The likely-voter subsample is n=1,398 with a published ±2.5-point margin of sampling error. Interviews used live landline/cell calls and text-to-web, with English and Spanish available. Weights used age, race, education, and area. The governor ballot named Abbott and Hinojosa only. Respondents unsure after the initial question were asked which candidate they leaned toward, so published results include that follow-up. Respondents who had already voted early were asked how they voted. Other and would-not-vote responses were under one-half percent. Another 1% did not know. Counted in the average under the leaner rule adopted Oct. 21, 2026: when a poll publishes a result that includes leaners, the table and average use it.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • Texas Public Opinion Research, Oct. 18, 2026

    Fielded October 15-18, 2026, via an online panel; n=969 likely voters, margin of error ±3.9 points; weighted by gender, race, age, education, income, geography, and 2024 vote recall. Shown with leaners (Q31, "Intermediate Push," after undecided respondents were asked which candidate they lean toward). First-choice result (Q29): Abbott 50%, Hinojosa 47%, undecided 2%. Libertarian Pat Dixon 1%; would not vote in that race shown as "-" in the topline. Still not sure after the lean question: 1%. TPOR's release headlines a "Final Push" result that asks remaining undecided respondents a second time and leaves none undecided; that forced result is not used. TPOR describes itself as a nonpartisan polling initiative and names no external commissioner. The site's copyright line names Luke Warford, whom the Texas Tribune (June 6, 2024) describes as the Texas Democratic Party's former chief strategy officer. This topline's page footer reads "Prepared by Slingshot Strategies"; September's read "Prepared by Texas Public Opinion Research."

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • Pollfinity Research, Oct. 18, 2026

    Fielded October 15-18, 2026; released October 22. 278 registered Texas voters by text-to-web, drawn from a statewide voter file and weighted to the 2022 midterm electorate; margin of error ±6.5 points at 95% confidence (effective n=230). Pollfinity says it was not requested or paid for by any candidate, party, or organization; it is owned and self-funded by Lars Mapstead, a 2024 Libertarian presidential candidate. Libertarian Pat Dixon 2%, someone else 2%, undecided 5%; the release reports one topline and no separate leaner follow-up. Registered-voter sample below the 500-respondent statewide minimum. Display only. Ballot wording not published. Same survey as the Senate row.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • CBS News / YouGov, Oct. 16, 2026

    CBS News poll conducted by YouGov, Oct. 8 to 16, 2026, online among 1,492 Texas registered voters (YouGov panel plus 13 from other panels), in English or Spanish. The poll was weighted to Census benchmarks and 2024 presidential vote. The margin of error is ±3.4 points for registered voters and ±3.5 for likely voters (CBS News published the methodology with its article: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/texas-senate-talarico-paxton-poll/). Likely voters are modeled from stated intention, demographics, and vote history rather than a cutoff screen, so the release gives no unweighted likely-voter count. The 1,343 figure in some trackers does not appear in the release. Q11 (Governor) asks "If the election were held today, would you vote for:" among likely voters, including those leaning toward a candidate. Someone else and not sure are both published as 0% (rounded). Crosstab weighted bases (Senate 1,458, Governor 1,460) are weighted counts, not respondents. Counted in the average under the leaner rule adopted Oct. 21, 2026: when a poll publishes a result that includes leaners, the table and average use it.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • University of Houston Hobby School of Public Affairs, Oct. 14, 2026

    Fielded Oct. 10 to 14, 2026 among 2,000 Texas likely voters contacted by SMS text and directed to an online survey, in English or Spanish. It was weighted by multidimensional calibration on demographic, historical electoral, and geographic benchmarks. The margin of error is ±2.19 points. The report and its Oct. 19 release publish no question wording and no separate questionnaire or topline document (as of Oct. 19, 2026, the Hobby School's Texas 2026 page links only this report, which prints the topline results). The report prints an undecided share and describes no leaner follow-up, the same disclosure standard as other polls in the average. No outside sponsor is named. Released Oct. 19, 2026. Libertarian Pat Dixon 2%, undecided 3%.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • ActiVote, Oct. 14, 2026

    ActiVote poll published October 14, 2026, field period September 30 to October 14 (median October 7), 400 likely midterm voters. Opt-in app panel: ActiVote users pick a preferred candidate on the race screen in its free voter-education app (English and Spanish), and the latest preference in the field window is counted. Weighted by demographics, voting chance from the L2 voter file, region, and ActiVote's own left-to-right 'Political Spectrum' score. ActiVote Inc., a Delaware public benefit corporation that describes itself as non-partisan, runs and funds every poll; no outside sponsor. Published as a two-way share that sums to 100 (Abbott 50.9, Hinojosa 49.1): no undecided or other-candidate figure is reported, and the Libertarian and independent candidates do not appear. The page header prints 'MoE ±4.9%', but ActiVote's AAPOR disclosure describes that figure as an 'average expected error' from its past accuracy that 'should not be mistaken for the Margin-of-Error of a probabilistic poll', so we show no margin of error. Display only: below the 500-respondent statewide minimum, and the two-way share is not comparable with initial ballots that report undecided voters.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • GS Strategy Group / New River Strategies (Cook Political Report), Oct. 13, 2026

    Fielded October 9-13, 2026, in partnership with The Cook Political Report. Libertarian Pat Dixon 3%, don't know 3%. Display only: no margin of error, mode, sample source, or weighting published.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • Marist Poll, Oct. 11, 2026

    Fielded October 8-11, 2026. Marist interviewed 1,196 Texas registered voters by live phone (265), text (698), and online (233), in English or Spanish; phone sample from L2's voter file, online respondents Cint-matched to it. Weighted by age, gender, income, race/ethnicity, education, and region. Likely-voter results apply a probability-of-voting weight to all registered voters, so Marist publishes no separate likely-voter count; the ±4.9-point likely-voter margin includes the design effect. Another party's candidate 1%, undecided 3%, volunteered no response 1%. Raw support, no leaner follow-up. Registered voters: Abbott 48%, Hinojosa 47%. The Marist Poll is an educational program funded by Marist University; no outside sponsor is named.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • ReconMR / Siena Research Institute, Oct. 8, 2026

    ReconMR / Siena Research Institute, fielded October 5 to 8, 2026 among 617 Texas likely voters (400 live phone in English and Spanish, 217 text-to-web); landline and cell sample from the L2 voter database, with quotas on region, race, and party. Weighted on party, age, sex, region, race/ethnicity, education, and stated and derived vote likelihood. Published ±4.4 points including the design effect. The TI disclosure names ReconMR as research sponsor, and the release describes ReconMR as "an independent, non-partisan research institute"; Siena's research institute co-presents the poll. Q5: someone else 1%, would not vote 1%, don't know/refused 3%. Initial ballot; no leaner follow-up is published.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • GBAO, Oct. 8, 2026

    GBAO memo dated October 12, 2026: "On behalf of the Hinojosa campaign, GBAO conducted a survey with 800 likely November 2026 voters in Texas from Oct. 5-8, 2026," by live-interviewer phone and text message in English and Spanish, ±3.5 points. Libertarian Pat Dixon 4%. The memo publishes neither question wording, sample frame, weighting, nor an undecided share. Campaign-sponsored poll, shown with the sponsor disclosed and excluded from the headline average.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • YouGov, Oct. 5, 2026

    YouGov in-house poll (no outside sponsor), fielded September 28 to October 5, 2026 among 3,625 Texas likely voters; published margin of error ±3 points. YouGov’s release article (Carl Bialik and David Montgomery; the UT Texas Politics Project tracker dates the release October 6) says likely voters were defined by a model using past vote, demographics, and self-reported likelihood to vote. Neither the article nor the toplines document discloses mode, sample frame, or weighting. Unlike the Senate question, the Governor question carries no statement that undecided voters were allocated. Other combines someone else 1% and will not vote in this race 0%. Display only: held out of the average because survey mode and weighting are undisclosed, the same treatment as the September Trafalgar poll.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • UT Texas Politics Project, Oct. 5, 2026

    University of Texas / Texas Politics Project in-house poll (no outside sponsor), fielded Sept. 25 to Oct. 5, 2026. YouGov interviewed 1,253 Texas registered voters online and matched them to 1,200, weighted by propensity score and post-stratified on 2024 presidential vote, gender, age, race, and education. Likely voters (weighted base 861, 905 unweighted respondents) report the published ±3.34-point margin. Pat Dixon (Libertarian) 1%, someone else 2%, not sure 0%. UT's published ballot folds in a forced follow-up ("If you had to make a choice, who would you choose?") among respondents who first said they didn't know, and the topline does not print the initial ballot. The initial ballot, computed from UT's posted microdata with its own likely-voter flag and weight, is Abbott 46.98%, Hinojosa 48.80%, not sure 2.44%. Counted in the average under the leaner rule adopted Oct. 21, 2026: when a poll publishes a result that includes leaners, the table and average use it.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • New York Times / Siena College, Sept. 30, 2026

    Fielded September 21–30, 2026 among 615 likely voters. Live cellular and landline interviews in English and Spanish; L2 voter-file sample supplemented with Marketing Systems Group matched telephone numbers. NYT weighted with energy balancing, demographic and turnout-history targets, and modeled/self-reported vote likelihood. Published full-sample margin of error ±4.5 points includes design effect 1.28. The smaller completed-interview sample (465; ±5.2 points) applies to later questions, not these ballot results. Governor ballot as published; no separate leaner follow-up is shown. Another candidate was reported as less than 0.5%, not an exact zero.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • Fox News, Sept. 28, 2026

    Fielded Sept. 24 to 28, 2026. The Fox News Poll was jointly directed by Beacon Research (D) and Shaw & Company Research (R). The 1,203 registered-voter sample was drawn from the statewide voter file. The likely-voter subsample is n=881 with a published ±3.0-point margin of sampling error. Interviews used live landline/cell calls and text-to-web, with English and Spanish available. Weights used age, race, education, and area. The governor ballot named Abbott and Hinojosa only. Respondents unsure after the initial question were asked which candidate they leaned toward, so published results include that follow-up. No other candidate or would-not-vote responses were recorded. Another 1% did not know. Counted in the average under the leaner rule adopted Oct. 21, 2026: when a poll publishes a result that includes leaners, the table and average use it.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • UMass Lowell / YouGov, Sept. 28, 2026

    UMass Lowell Center for Public Opinion survey fielded by YouGov, September 18 to 28, 2026, released October 8: 850 Texas likely voters, self-administered online, non-probability sample matched to a sampling frame and weighted to CPS voting supplement weights and 2024 presidential vote, with weights adjusted toward likely voters. Adjusted margin ±4.5 points. "The University of Massachusetts Lowell sponsored the research." Pat Dixon (Libertarian) 1%, another candidate 0%, would not vote 1%, undecided 6%. Initial ballot; no leaner follow-up.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • Guidant Polling & Strategy / Public First Action, Sept. 28, 2026

    Guidant Polling & Strategy memo dated October 6, 2026: 800 likely general-election voters, September 20 to 28, 2026, mostly cell phone with text-to-web and landline interviews, ±3.46 points; weighting, sample frame, and likely-voter definition are not disclosed. The memo was released as images in a Semafor reporter's post (October 7) introduced as "New polls commissioned by Public First Action"; no copy appears on Guidant's or the sponsor's site. Public First Action is a 501(c)(4) whose founders announced two super PACs. Pat Dixon (Libertarian) 4%, undecided 5%. The memo's text says Hinojosa 42%, but its chart and stated 2-point margin give 44%, which is used here. Advocacy-group-sponsored poll, shown with the sponsor disclosed and excluded from the headline average.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • Big Data Poll, Sept. 26, 2026

    Big Data Poll for its Public Polling Project (crowdfunded, supplemented by Big Data Poll if necessary), released Sept. 27, fielded Sept. 24 to 26, 2026 among 698 likely voters (793 registered). The margin of error is ±4.0 points at 95% confidence. About 60% live phone, P2P SMS, and text-to-online from the L2 voter file and about 40% online via Lucid (Cint). It was weighted by sex, age, race and ethnicity, education, and geography. The release says the project is not funded by or affiliated with any candidate, campaign, or committee. Published to one decimal. With undecided voters asked to lean: Abbott 48.9%, Hinojosa 44.4%. The release text gives no registered-voter Governor figures. The release text gives no initial-ballot undecided or other shares. They are not recorded here. First-choice result before the leaner follow-up: Abbott 47.1%, Hinojosa 43.5%. Counted in the average under the leaner rule adopted Oct. 21, 2026: when a poll publishes a result that includes leaners, the table and average use it.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • Stratus Intelligence, Sept. 24, 2026

    Stratus Intelligence memo, fielded September 22 to 24, 2026 among 865 likely voters; 81% SMS-to-web and 19% live phone; ±3.5 points. The memo names no sponsor and publishes neither question wording nor weighting. Breitbart (September 29) and the Wikipedia Senate-race listing report the poll was conducted for Texans for a Conservative Majority. Sponsored poll, shown with the sponsor disclosed and excluded from the headline average. The memo does not state the undecided share for this race.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • Texas Public Opinion Research, Sept. 22, 2026

    Fielded September 19-22, 2026, via an online panel; n=1,007 likely voters, margin of error ±3.6 points. Shown with leaners (Q23). First-choice result (Q21): Abbott 49%, Hinojosa 45%. Libertarian Pat Dixon 1%; would not vote in that race 1%. TPOR describes itself as a nonpartisan polling initiative and names no external commissioner. The site’s copyright line names Luke Warford, whom the Texas Tribune (June 6, 2024) describes as the Texas Democratic Party’s former chief strategy officer. Weighting used gender, age, race, education, 2024 vote recall, and geography.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • Marist Poll, Sept. 20, 2026

    Fielded September 17-20, 2026 among Texas registered voters age 18+. The published result is raw support, with no leaner follow-up. The sample used live phone (203), text (692), and online (244) interviews; English and Spanish; phone respondents were sampled from L2's voter file and online panel respondents were Cint-matched to that file. Results were weighted by age, gender, income, race/ethnicity, education, and region. The published ±4.4-point margin includes a 2.33 design effect. The Marist Poll is an educational public-opinion program funded by Marist University; no external commissioner is named.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • Texas Southern University, Sept. 19, 2026

    Fielded September 15-19, 2026. The Barbara Jordan Public Policy Research and Survey Center at TSU reports a probability-based sample of 1,800 likely voters, ±2.31-point margin of error, and a two-part likely-voter screen supplemented by past election participation. A random sample of registered voters was contacted by SMS and directed to an online survey in English or Spanish. The report does not name the sampling or survey vendor or any outside sponsor. The published table includes an explicit 4% unsure category and names Libertarian Pat Dixon at 2%; it describes no leaned follow-up.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • Emerson College, Sept. 14, 2026

    Fielded September 12-14, 2026. Sponsored by Nexstar Media. Libertarian Pat Dixon received 2%; 4% were undecided. The reported ±3.0 figure is a 95% credibility interval, not a traditional sampling margin of error. MMS text-to-web from a probability-based voter panel plus PureSpectrum; weighted by gender, education, race, age, and region; English only.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • ReconMR / Siena Research Institute, Sept. 11, 2026

    Fielded September 8-11, 2026. ReconMR/Siena's nonpartisan Texas Poll. Prompt named only Abbott and Hinojosa; 2% chose someone else, 1% would not vote, and 4% did not know or refused. Pat Dixon was an unprompted open-end response rounded to 0%. Mixed live telephone and text-to-web voter-file sample; telephone interviews in English and Spanish. MOE includes design effects. Published rounded categories sum to 101%.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • NBC 5 Dallas / Telemundo Texas / Mason-Dixon, Sept. 10, 2026

    Mason-Dixon Polling & Research poll for the Telemundo stations in Texas; NBC 5 Dallas publishes it as the NBC 5 Dallas/Telemundo Station Group Texas Voter Poll. Released September 21, 2026. Fielded September 8 to 10, 2026: 625 registered voters who said they were likely to vote in November, interviewed live by telephone after random selection from a telephone-matched voter registration list with landline and cell numbers; quotas were set to reflect voter turnout by county. The results document describes no weighting. Margin of error ±4 points at 95% confidence. Order-rotated ballot naming Libertarian Pat Dixon (1%) and Jenn Mack Raphoon, listed as No Party Affiliation (2%); 8% undecided. A separate 401-person Hispanic likely-voter survey (September 8 to 12, ±5) is not included in this row.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • N+ Univision / YouGov, Sept. 4, 2026

    Fielded August 27-September 4, 2026. N+ Univision media survey conducted online by YouGov. Registered voters, so excluded from the likely-voter headline. The nonprobability survey reports an equivalent margin of error for a matched propensity-score design, not a traditional sampling MOE. Crosstabs label this measure 'Combined - Recoded' and do not publish exact ballot wording or leaner treatment; 1% chose another candidate and 5% were undecided.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • AARP / Fabrizio Ward + Impact Research, Sept. 1, 2026

    Fielded Aug. 30 to Sept. 1, 2026. Commissioned by AARP and conducted by the bipartisan team of Fabrizio Ward and Impact Research. Published total includes a forced follow-up among initially undecided voters. The annotated questionnaire does not publish a clean, exact unallocated topline. In the two-candidate prompt, 5% remained undecided after the follow-up. Live cell 40%, live landline 15%, and SMS-to-web 45%. The poll was in English and Spanish. The sample came from a voter list. Sampling error is unadjusted for design effects. Counted in the average under the leaner rule adopted Oct. 21, 2026: when a poll publishes a result that includes leaners, the table and average use it.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • Overton Insights / Texas Public Policy Foundation, Aug. 26, 2026

    Joint survey released Sept. 2, 2026 by the Texas Public Policy Foundation, which describes itself as a non-profit free-market research institute, and Overton Insights, which describes itself as a nonpartisan public opinion research firm. Text-to-web survey of 1,167 likely voters, Aug. 24 to 26, 2026. The margin of error is ±2.9 points. The toplines say the data were weighted using iterative weighting but do not list the weighting targets, the sample source, or the likely-voter definition. Initial two-way ballot, published to one decimal. The undecided share was 7.3%. After a forced lean question, the published cumulative result is Abbott 51.2%, Hinojosa 48.8%. Counts toward the average: the site’s written rule excludes campaign- and political-operative-sponsored polls, and a non-profit research institute is neither. First-choice result before the leaner follow-up: Abbott 46.9%, Hinojosa 45.8%. Counted in the average under the leaner rule adopted Oct. 21, 2026: when a poll publishes a result that includes leaners, the table and average use it.

    Sponsor review: Release and report checked

    Disclosed research partner: Texas Public Policy Foundation (Policy research and advocacy nonprofit).

    Funding: Not disclosed in the reviewed materials.

    The joint release identifies a research partnership, not an itemized funding arrangement. These documents do not establish a campaign or PAC commission.

    Reviewed Oct. 20, 2026.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • Texas Public Opinion Research, Aug. 24, 2026

    TPOR director Luke Warford is a Democratic strategist. Ballot named Libertarian Pat Dixon at 1% and independent Jenn Mack Raphoon at 1%. Fielded before the Aug. 28 ballot certification. Jenn Mack Raphoon is not printed on the November ballot, but she is a certified write-in candidate for governor, so votes cast for her are counted.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • UT Texas Politics Project, Aug. 13, 2026

    Ballot named Libertarian Pat Dixon at 3%. Registered voters, not likely voters.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • Emerson College, Aug. 10, 2026

    Emerson College Polling/Nexstar Media, fielded Aug. 9 to 10. 4% undecided.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • Texas Southern University, July 30, 2026

    Three-way ballot incl. Pat Dixon (L) 3%, with 5% undecided. Barbara Jordan Public Policy Research and Survey Center. The poll used SMS-to-web, was fielded July 27 to 30, and was coauthored by Rice's Mark P. Jones. Sampling frame and weighting variables are not disclosed in the report.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • Texas Pulse / ReconMR, July 30, 2026

    Texas A&M Bush School consortium, fielded July 27 to 30, released Aug. 7. MOE is the core-question figure (n=619). The ballot is two-way. Abbott led 49-43 in the June wave.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • Fox News, July 27, 2026

    Beacon Research (D) and Shaw & Company Research (R), fielded July 23 to 27. Live interviewers on landlines and cellphones plus text-to-web, sampled from the statewide voter file. Registered voters, not likely voters. Both ballots are inside the margin of error.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • Texas Public Opinion Research, July 17, 2026

    TPOR director Luke Warford is a Democratic strategist; conducted with Lake Research Partners.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • New York Times / Siena College, June 27, 2026

    Independent newsroom-sponsored poll. Fielded June 19 to 27, published June 30. The sample is n=656. Governor ballot: Abbott 51%, Hinojosa 44%, undecided/refused 5%. Another candidate was less than 0.5%. Fieldwork end and response categories checked against the historical comparison in the subscriber-supplied September NYT toplines on Oct. 6.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • UT Texas Politics Project, June 22, 2026

    Registered voters, fielded June 5-12 by YouGov.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • Texas Public Opinion Research, April 20, 2026

    TPOR director Luke Warford is a Democratic strategist; commissioner not disclosed.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • UT Tyler, Feb. 22, 2026

    Polled before the March 3 primary set the nominees.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)
  • Emerson College, Jan 2026

    Polled before the March 3 primary set the nominees.

    Original poll release (opens in new tab)

Each row is one poll, shown as reported. Before Election Day, headline cards averaged eligible likely-voter polls of the nominees taken since the runoff, leaving out polls sponsored by campaigns or political operatives and polls held out over method or ballot differences. See the methodology page. The reported gap is the difference between candidate percentages, not a finding of a statistically significant lead. An undecided share appears only when explicitly recorded from the source; a dash means it has not been recorded. Independently rounded categories may not sum to 100%. Likely-voter (LV) and registered-voter (RV) samples are not directly comparable.

Join the TexPolls Email List

No set schedule and no spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Campaign Finance

Dataset updated Nov. 1, 2026

Candidate accounts, plus the campaign committees named on each row. Super PACs and other outside groups are not included. Texas Ethics Commission figures cover one account and reporting period each, not a full cycle.

Greg AbbottRaised $26.0M

Texas Ethics Commission · Reporting period: Sept. 25, 2026–Oct. 24, 2026

Account: Texans for Greg Abbott committee (separate candidate account excluded)

Filing Details

Texans for Greg Abbott (SPAC, filer 00051153), 8-day-before-general report 101072179 filed Oct. 26, covering Sept. 25 to Oct. 24, 2026. Raised and spent are this report period's totals. Cash on hand is the period-end balance TEC reports as political contributions maintained. The separate Greg Abbott C/OH account is excluded because adding accounts risks double-counting transfers. The filing reports $0.00 in outstanding loan principal.

Gina HinojosaRaised $17.7M

Texas Ethics Commission · Reporting period: Sept. 25, 2026–Oct. 24, 2026

Account: Gina Hinojosa candidate account

Filing Details

Regina Hinojosa candidate/officeholder account (filer 00080440), corrected 8-day-before-general report 101073400 filed Oct. 29, covering Sept. 25 to Oct. 24, 2026. The correction supersedes report 101072652 (filed Oct. 26), which TEC now marks information-only. It raises reported political contributions from $17,509,791.40 to $17,659,893.91 and leaves expenditures, cash on hand, and loans unchanged. Raised and spent are this report period's totals. Cash on hand is the period-end balance TEC reports as political contributions maintained. The filing reports $387,000.00 in outstanding loan principal.

Campaign finance data for candidates
CandidatePartyRaisedSpentCash on HandCoverage
Greg AbbottRepublican$26,034,609.08$35,410,081.56$8,557,058.68Texas Ethics Commission · Reporting period: Sept. 25, 2026–Oct. 24, 2026
Gina HinojosaDemocratic$17,659,893.91$19,143,952.97$989,979.61Texas Ethics Commission · Reporting period: Sept. 25, 2026–Oct. 24, 2026
Prediction Markets Before Election Day

Last prices recorded before returns were reported, not updated with results. Kalshi traders priced this race at 67% for Greg Abbott, and Polymarket traders at 64%. These prices aren't polls or a TexPolls estimate.

Pre-Election Snapshot

As of Nov. 3, 2026
Market odds by venue
CandidateKalshiPolymarket
Gina Hinojosa35%37%
Greg Abbott67%64%

Abbott fell from 82% on Sept. 6 to 64% on Nov. 3 on Polymarket. Hinojosa rose from 18% to 37% over that period.

Each venue's prices can add to slightly more or less than 100% because of trading spreads.

Betting odds, not scientific polling or a TexPolls forecast·As of Nov. 3, 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Who won the 2026 Texas Governor race?

Gina Hinojosa (D) won the Texas governor race with 52.8% of the vote to Greg Abbott's (R) 45.7%, as called by the Associated Press. Results are unofficial until the canvass.

Who was on the 2026 ballot for Texas Governor?

Gina Hinojosa (Democratic), Greg Abbott (Republican), and Pat Dixon (Libertarian) were on the November 3 ballot.

Greg Abbott vs. Gina Hinojosa: who was on the ballot for Texas Governor?

Incumbent Republican Greg Abbott and Democrat Gina Hinojosa were the major-party candidates for Texas Governor on the November 3, 2026 ballot.

Where can I see 2026 results for Texas Governor?

This page publishes Texas Secretary of State returns for Texas Governor as they become available. Election-night counts are unofficial until canvassed, and TexPolls marks a race called only after a named news organization calls it.

Key Dates

General ElectionNov. 3, 2026

Also on the November ballot

Paxton vs. Talarico for U.S. Senate